George Washington
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
660  Madison Yerke JR 21:05
782  Halley Brown JR 21:14
1,147  Suzanne Dannheim SO 21:37
1,718  Gabby Vlattas SO 22:14
1,948  Lauren T'Kint JR 22:29
1,975  Lesley Fatica JR 22:31
2,007  Rachel Gallivan SO 22:33
2,143  Margaret Coogan FR 22:43
2,264  Malone Gabor SR 22:53
2,422  Amelia Larken FR 23:09
2,460  Kelli Stetson JR 23:11
2,712  Olivia Horgan FR 23:41
National Rank #185 of 348
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #17 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.1%
Top 20 in Regional 97.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Madison Yerke Halley Brown Suzanne Dannheim Gabby Vlattas Lauren T'Kint Lesley Fatica Rachel Gallivan Margaret Coogan Malone Gabor Amelia Larken Kelli Stetson
William & Mary Invitational 09/15 1156 20:56 20:54 21:27 22:16 22:11 22:33 22:35 22:35 22:37 22:47 23:05
Paul Short Brown 09/29 1180 20:52 21:12 21:54 22:32 21:58 22:54
George Mason Invitational 09/30 1313 22:22 22:30 23:00 23:03 23:08
Princeton Invitational 10/14 1226 21:13 21:12 22:29 22:33 22:43 22:48 23:10 24:14 23:53
A10 Championship 10/28 1145 20:41 21:15 21:18 22:10 22:47 22:30 22:16 22:02 22:47 23:19
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/10 1221 21:16 21:17 21:44 22:20 22:38 23:13





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.7 487 0.1 0.6 2.2 4.4 9.4 12.3 15.5 17.6 18.4 11.8 5.3 2.0 0.5 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Madison Yerke 52.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3
Halley Brown 62.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Suzanne Dannheim 90.3
Gabby Vlattas 135.9
Lauren T'Kint 152.1
Lesley Fatica 155.1
Rachel Gallivan 157.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.6% 0.6 11
12 2.2% 2.2 12
13 4.4% 4.4 13
14 9.4% 9.4 14
15 12.3% 12.3 15
16 15.5% 15.5 16
17 17.6% 17.6 17
18 18.4% 18.4 18
19 11.8% 11.8 19
20 5.3% 5.3 20
21 2.0% 2.0 21
22 0.5% 0.5 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0